EDITION: Edgecombe County
FAQs PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD ADVERTISE YOUR BUSINESS
44 °
Fog/Mist
Registered Users, Log In Here
Gay Marriage legal in NC as of RIGHT NOW

foxhunt

Posted 12:26 pm, 10/16/2014

Many lesbians and even women who were just considered lesbians over the years have been subjected to "Corrective Rape" to show them what they are missing.

benchwarmer99

Posted 11:49 am, 10/16/2014

Franklin Graham

Subpoenas for sermons? I'm thankful for all those who stood against the The City of Houston's attack on Christians yesterday. The Mayor's office has backed down on subpoenas for all sermons discussing Biblical marriage, homosexuality and gender identity. They are still demanding that the pastors turn over some documents, so this is not over yet. Pray that the Church will stand strong for the Word of God, and if you're in Houston, I urge you to let your leaders know this is an outrage.


benchwarmer99

This mayor in Houston,Texas is a lesbian. This is what she is bashing toward the christians and their churches..think about all your comments where you stated that gays and lesbians are not hurting people....

alonzo harris

Posted 9:10 am, 10/16/2014

From the "we're not forcing our lifestyle down anyone's throat" file...

UK: Mass LGBT-kiss makes 'homophobic' Sainsbury's taste the difference

VideoID: 20141015-048 W/S Crowd enters Sainsbury's M/S Girls enter Sainsbury's M/S Girls kissing...

Length: 1:28

Antebellum

Posted 8:40 am, 10/16/2014

Forever Cynic they are not the same study and was not done at the same time, nor the same place. I am extremely glad you brought it up, since it helps solidify the male sexual response to porn being in direct "category specific" to their self identified sexuality. I was citing a study about Homophobia, you have introduced another Study about what can cause Female arousal, not homophobia, sexuality nor actual sexual history. That study was done by Prof. Michael Bailey and Chivers in 2001. Chivers continuing the study, found that while women who watched porn in general were more likely to respond to all forms of porn, however males were different. Heterosexual males responding to any porn involving females, and homosexual men responded to porn involving men, thus reinforcing the validity of the study by Dr. Adams concerning male Homophobes, being sexually aroused by gay porn, indicating their own homosexual attraction.



http://www.nytimes.com/2009...l&_r=0

TheMUSE

Posted 7:28 am, 10/16/2014

well Alonzo, until the law changed last week, the magistrates were allowed to refuse to marry a gay couple under the law. The law changed... so therefore the magistrates job changed. Now the magistrates need to decide if they can perform their civic duties under the NEW law.

alonzo harris

Posted 7:23 am, 10/16/2014

The gay lobby has been demanding for years that all laws be CHANGED to suit them...and moments after their demands are met; they start acting like strict compliance to laws is what they're all about. Go figure.

Top Soil

Posted 7:10 am, 10/16/2014

They aren't being forced. They have the choice to either comply with the law and do the job they were hired to do, or they can choose to seek employment somewhere that allows them to adhere to their beliefs.

Bestill

Posted 6:35 am, 10/16/2014

Doctors have never been forced to perform abortions if religiously opposed. Why not judges?

Top Soil

Posted 6:34 am, 10/16/2014

Repub-we-can (view profile)

Posted 6:08 am, 10/16/2014

So if a doctor is a Christian he/she should be forced to perform an abortion. If a magistrate is a Christian and opposes homosexuality he/she should be forced to perform a wedding. Does this mean a homosexual that opposes Christianity should be forced to go to church. Something is wrong with this logic. I think it is all about the word "force". No one likes to be forced to do things.

You picked awful examples.
Doctors = specialize in areas. if a christian doctor is hired as an abortionist, then shouldn't they do the job that they agreed to? if not, that doctor can always write a referral to another doctor. Keep in mind that some pregnancies have to be terminated in order for the mother to live, if a doctor refuses to acknowledge this fact and ends up killing both woman and fetus, then we are talking malpractice.

Magistrate = public employee hired to enforce the law of the land. If for any reason they can not perform the duties in which they agreed to, and were hired to perform, then they have the right to step down. hiring someone who refuses to do their job sounds like wasting tax dollars to me.

forcing someone to go to church is called...kidnap which IS a federal offence. but I admit this is a poorly formed attempt at a retort.

Bestill

Posted 6:33 am, 10/16/2014

I have no problem with doctors or judges not performing abortions or officiating marriages because of religious belief. I reckon it is their right to do so. I also respect folks who will not join the military because they don't want to kill anybody.

Repub-we-can

Posted 6:08 am, 10/16/2014

So if a doctor is a Christian he/she should be forced to perform an abortion. If a magistrate is a Christian and opposes homosexuality he/she should be forced to perform a wedding. Does this mean a homosexual that opposes Christianity should be forced to go to church. Something is wrong with this logic. I think it is all about the word "force". No one likes to be forced to do things.

Top Soil

Posted 6:03 am, 10/16/2014

Repub-we-can (view profile)

Posted 5:39 am, 10/16/2014

So, find the logic in this: If you oppose perversion, you must be a closet pervert. Right out of the playbook of the left. The very things they decry in others turns out to be what they really are. What about that it works both ways.

Because...Science!

Repub-we-can

Posted 5:39 am, 10/16/2014

So, find the logic in this: If you oppose perversion, you must be a closet pervert. Right out of the playbook of the left. The very things they decry in others turns out to be what they really are. What about that it works both ways.

Forever Cynic

Posted 5:38 am, 10/16/2014

Antebellum, that same study found that practically all of the women were physically aroused by both gay and straight porn. Leading to the conclusion that, at least physically, all women are bisexual.

It also found that the men were strictly either aroused by gay porn OR straight porn. Leading to the conclusion that, at least physically, there's no such thing as a bisexual man.

Happy_Gurl

Posted 4:03 am, 10/16/2014

Excellent post antebellum!!!! Most people just do NOT want to understand this or agree with this. Those who are very secure within themselves are not bothered about homosexuality or lesbianism. Time to let this rest. Just be happy for anyone who has happiness, love, and a real life.

nohomo

Posted 11:15 pm, 10/15/2014

Antebellum is a sick dog, read the post!

Antebellum

Posted 11:06 pm, 10/15/2014

After taking a look at this forum today, it reminded me of a study by Dr. Henry Adam, Wright, and Lohr in 1996. Dr. Adams and associates sent out a form to males. By the way the males answered they were deemed homophobic or non-homophobic. Both groups were sent individually into a room with sensors around their genitals, and shown gay porn. The non-homophobic males did not get aroused, however, the majority of homophobic males did become aroused, and then even denied it despite the evidence of their own arousal, being in so much self denial.

It must be extremely stressful to be so homophobic because of self denial of one's true nature, to have to fight against it with prejudice, hate, denial and fear. http://www.psychologytoday...._et_al.pdf

nohomo

Posted 11:01 pm, 10/15/2014

God said it is an abomination! Romans 1 ...any homo skeptics? Nkjv 1 Corinthians 6:6-12

sparkling water

Posted 8:34 pm, 10/15/2014

My reasons are not the issue. My right to object is.

Hepsibah

Posted 8:29 pm, 10/15/2014

sparkling, what part of the "union" do you find to be objectionable?

Your Reply

Your Username:

Your Password:


 
Add Reply
Cancel